Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +937%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy