Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy