Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +1245%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy