Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +1225%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
46
512
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy