CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile
+1225%
17.66 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
VS
RTX A4500 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
4
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
5
NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
6
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
7
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy