Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +7735%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy