NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
+284%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
