CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 168GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1816MHz
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
+598%
9.3 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
VS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1816 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
87.2 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.3 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
2
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
3
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
4
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
5
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
6
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
7
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA A10M
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy