Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +15%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy