Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +54%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy