Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200 +186%
3.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy