Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla M40 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M40 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1163MHz vs 1112MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M40 +282%
6.832 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla M40
106
Quadro M2000
107
OctaneBench
Tesla M40 +355%
123
Quadro M2000
27
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla Maxwell
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

948 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1112 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
213.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.832 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
213.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GM206
GM200-895-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy