Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1180MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M6 +4431%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
32
96
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G84
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy