Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1480MHz vs 1180MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M6 +19%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GP106
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy