Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1480MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 DGXS +494%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy