Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2100MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 SXM2
10.61 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +1440%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
192GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
3584
Shading Units
19456
224
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
MI300
GP100-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
750W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy