Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 SXM2 +2196%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GT200B
GP100-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy