Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 SXM2 +932%
10.61 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
448
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
247W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GF110
GP100-890-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy