Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Tesla P40 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P40 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1531MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (347.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P40 +558%
11.76 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla P40 +443%
788
Quadro M2000
145
OctaneBench
Tesla P40 +492%
166
Quadro M2000
28
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla Pascal
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1808 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
347.1GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
367.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
183.7 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.76 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
367.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy