Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P6 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla P6 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1506MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P6 +245%
6.169 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla P6 +239%
95
Quadro M2000
28
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2017
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1012 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1506 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
192.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
96.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
192.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM206
GP104-995-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy