Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +6043%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
12
5120
Shading Units
96
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
24
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
134W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy