Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +2958%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
24
5120
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy