Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1380MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +103%
14.13 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
20
5120
Shading Units
2560
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
12 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy