Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1700MHz vs 1530MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
15.67 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +188%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
13312
320
TMUs
832
128
ROPs
0
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Volta
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy