Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1530MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +268%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
2048
320
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy