CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
+21075%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
VS
Quadro NVS 320M
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
2
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
4
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
5
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
6
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
7
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy