CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
+4428%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
0.346 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
VS
Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
128
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
24
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
320W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
2
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
4
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
5
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
6
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
7
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy