Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1530MHz vs 1350MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +88%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
48
5120
Shading Units
3072
320
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
TU104
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy