Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075 +436%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
35W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy