Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +125%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
55W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy