Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Tesla S1075
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
NVIDIA Quadro K620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +38%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
45W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy