Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +1647%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
48
240
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
110W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy