CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
VS
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+7176%
45.26 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
VS
Radeon Instinct MI250
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
13312
80
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
500W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
2
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
3
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA L40S
4
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
5
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
6
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
7
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
8
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
9
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
10
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy