Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +7176%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
13312
80
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
500W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy