Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +1150%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
448
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

900W
TDP
260W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy