Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Tesla S2050
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +938%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

900W
TDP
50W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy