Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +39%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

900W
TDP
68W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy