Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +109%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

900W
TDP
75W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy