Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +1128%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
448
Shading Units
3840
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

900W
TDP
250W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy