Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB +12238%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
6
5120
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy