Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Boost Clock1290MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 829.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 FHHL
13.21 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +4%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1290 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
7680
320
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
120
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
412.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
26.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
13.21 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
6.605 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy