Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1290MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 FHHL +57334%
13.21 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1290 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
1
5120
Shading Units
8
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
412.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
26.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.21 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
6.605 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
12W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy