Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +3438%
16.35 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1245 MHz
Base Clock
-
1597 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
24
5120
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

204.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
511.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
32.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
8.177 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
108W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy