Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB +6118%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
112
320
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy