Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2070
1.166 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +80%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1344
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
36.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1166 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
582.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-876-A3
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy