NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla X2070
+3920%
1.166 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
36.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1166 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
582.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G86
GF100-876-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
