Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +3236%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
14336
64
TMUs
896
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
450W
550 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
100 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy