Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +127%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy