CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
VS
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
NVIDIA RTX A4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4000
+1339%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
VS
RTX A4000
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
512
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
140W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
2
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
3
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
4
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
5
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
6
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
7
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
8
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s
9
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
10
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy