Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +974%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
46
512
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy