NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 285
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+2723%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1792
576
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
190W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Tonga
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO
(215-0851128)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
