Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +11996%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
512
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy